Don't run away because of the title of this book. The authors do believe that Jesus existed and was the Son of God. The aim of authors Eddy and Boyd is to carefully study and ultimately call into question those who do not believe Jesus was the Son of God, or that he even existed. In order to do so, they very carefully distance themselves from their faith most of the way through the book in order to make their treatise as academic as possible. Be aware that this is a scholarly treatise. It is not easy to read, but if you are reasonably intelligent, as I believe my readers are, you can understand it and come away more assured about your own faith.
The first chapter is nearly interminable. Don't run away from that either. Just read a section or two at a time, keeping a dictionary handy. The authors are setting forth not only what they are investigating, but also how they plan to do it. That part does get a little tedious, but I am not sure you will understand what you are reading if you skip it. Once you are past that, it goes much more quickly. In fact, the last half of the book is a breeze after that.
The scholars the authors are speaking about say they are using the "historical-critical" method, which includes a naturalistic (no miracles allowed) approach to everything. Eddy and Boyd show how this method is nothing more than post-Gutenberg Western Academia blowing their own horn as the only ones who are doing it right. They are charged with chronocentrism, ethnocentrism and circular reasoning. "When nothing is allowed to count as evidence against a presupposition, and when nothing is allowed to call into question one's metaphysical commitments, the commitment to the presupposition is, for all intents and purposes, a religious commitment to a dogma…This hardly seems consistent with a discipline that calls itself 'critical' and strives to be…objective and unbiased…in its assessment of evidence." The authors then advocate an "open" historical-critical method, which they believe is much more fair and includes the humility to recognize that they are not the only intelligent ones out there. More than once, Western Academia is scolded for its arrogance. Some of the arguments made by these people to "prove" that the Gospels are no more than myth even I can answer. The fact that Jesus' sermons on the same topic are often "different" in each gospel? I am married to a preacher. He often preaches the same sermons again and again, but he does not use exactly the same words. It depends upon the audience for one thing, and anyone telling the same story more than once will use different words with each telling. It is not a rote performance.
The authors answer every objection these scholars make in their own very scholarly way. At the end, they don their theological hats for a final brief moment and say, "the Holy Spirit, personal commitment, and covenant trust must carry one the rest of the way. If this work has, to any extent helped to clarify the solid historical grounds for this faith response, it has served its purpose." I think it does exactly that.
The Jesus Legend is published by Baker Academics and is also available on Kindle.
Dene Ward