Today's post is by guest writer Lucas Ward.
I don't like change. Mom says I've been that way since I was a baby. I liked the same books read, the same routines, the same songs sung; I found comfort in the normal. That continued as I grew up. I had opportunities to move to nicer apartments when I lived in Gainesville as my career moved forward, but I was comfortable where I was. Honestly, a big reason I never married is because that would be too big a change. It is not commitment that is scary, it is change. When Mom and Dad moved from the home I grew up in, that they lived in for nearly 40 years, to a newer, better, bigger home nearer to their grand-kids and to medical care and with other benefits to them as well, it really shook me. This big, tough man who won't admit when he is hurt or sick, riding a bike twelve miles with a fever or swimming with a shoulder so bad I can't lift my arm, this guy sat down and cried for over an hour. In some ways, I still haven't forgiven them for leaving home, despite being happy for them for all the ways the new place is better. I don't like change.
This extends, of course, to church services and practices. I have always preferred the two songs, prayer, song, Lord's Supper, song, sermon, song order of worship, twice on Sundays with Bible class beforehand in the morning. Then the church I grew up in changed its service order. Two worship services back to back in the morning, with Bible class crunched between and the services were ordered differently to boot. No evening worship. There is nothing scripturally wrong with such a thing. The elders believed it would better serve the majority of the members. I didn't like it; it was different. Now my brother's family and my parents worship at a congregation that has a mid-afternoon service with none in the morning or evening. Heresy! And yet it is not, it is just different. (And I don't like it.)
All of this leads to 1 Cor. 9:19-22 "For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some." When Paul mentions Jews and then those under the Law he is speaking of the same group, but it is best understood as cultural and religious. When with Jews, Paul followed typical Jewish protocol and went through the motions of keeping the Mosaic Law. In Acts 21:18-26, Paul participates in offering a sacrifice at the Temple to placate Jewish Christians. This is the same Paul who wrote in Galatians 5:4 "You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace." But remember "not being myself under the law". Paul never tried to be justified by the Law, but if he could reach more by going through the motions, he did.
Then Paul discusses life among the Gentiles, "those outside the law". Paul, who declared himself a Hebrew of Hebrews and a Pharisee (Phil. 3:5), would live as a Gentile. He ate things sacrificed to idols (1 Cor. 10:27) in the homes of Gentiles, which Peter said was against Jewish law (Acts 10:28) Do you think he kept the Sabbath while teaching in the school of Tyrannus? There is no way to know for sure, but since he was teaching Gentiles in the school building of a Gentile I doubt it, especially in the light of 1 Cor. 9. Can you imagine how hard this would have been for Paul? Being raised to look down upon and scorn Gentiles, to keep the Law above all other considerations except perhaps to keep the traditions of the elders which were held even higher than the law in the mind of some Pharisees. For that man to live as though without law would have probably hurt, literally, in some psychological fashion. Yet he lived that way, so he could teach more about Christ. The key here is that he never left the law of Christ. He gave up the Law of Moses and all Jewish traditions and customs, many of which must have been dear to him, to reach more people. "That by all means I might save some."
The Restoration mythos in the United States was "Where the Bible speaks, we speak. Where the Bible is silent, we are silent." As a whole what has become known as the Church of Christ is very good at speaking where the Bible speaks. We teach the truth of the Lord's Gospel well. What we fail at miserably is being silent where the Bible is silent. If the Bible says nothing at all about a topic, for or against, then we shouldn't be making rules about that topic. We can have opinions, personal likes and dislikes, but we need to take care not to enforce personal preferences on others (Romans 14:1-10). Ultimately, if Paul was willing to make himself very uncomfortable to have a better chance at preaching the Gospel to lost souls, shouldn't we be willing to change how-we've-always-done-it to have a better chance at preaching to lost souls? (1 Cor. 11:1)
The bottom line is most people you meet everyday are lost souls who will be damned to hell for eternity if we don't teach them the Gospel. Are we willing to make ourselves uncomfortable to reach those souls? Go to a religious Christmas party, without participating in erroneous worship, because it opens the door to speak of the Gospel. Be willing to sing newer, more up beat hymns while also teaching why the old standards became old standards. Be willing to change the order of worship/time of worship/types of services if it helps bring in sinners to hear the Gospel and better edifies the church, all while maintaining an orderly worship (1 Cor. 14:40). I don't like change, but Jesus died to save these people. Are we willing to be a little uncomfortable to teach them the Gospel?
1 Cor. 9:22 ". . . that by all means I might save some."
Lucas Ward